Rumi’s ‘Beloved’, Not Heidegger’s ‘Being’

‘Empty Logical Classes. Ontological Assumptions. Teleological Fulfillment.

Which planet are you from? This is pretentious bunk. Male testosterone rutted in a linear groove.

I pine for Rumi’s ‘Beloved’; not Heidegger’s ‘Being’. I am a woman. I move  with my Heart. I dance with the Gopis, I too am in love with Krishna.

All this is ‘Man-Stuff’. Where are the women?. The Dharma, like everything else, has been hijacked by men who then get to write the Manual’.

Do men genuflect to stern high abstractions more readily? And do women love: ‘Love’ a little too much? Ask the Poets; this is just Philosophy drone.